According to reports the Reds want the system to continue and improve.

That is despite the club being on the wrong end of one of the highest-profile officiating errors of the season, when a Luis Diaz goal at Tottenham in October was wrongly ruled out after miscommunication between on-field referee Simon Hooper and VAR Darren England.

Another top-flight club have also indicated their support for VAR when contacted by media, but wished not to be named at this stage.

A further unnamed club said they would not vote to scrap VAR, citing the inconsistency it would create for those teams playing in Europe, and that it would amount to five years' investment going down the drain.

The early expressions of backing for VAR follow Wolves submitting a resolution on Wednesday calling for a vote to scrap the system at the league's annual general meeting.

Wolves' supporters trust has also called on fans of other teams to lobby their clubs in an effort to scrap it.

"VAR has taken the enjoyment out of the game we all know and love with such little benefit," the Wolves 1877 Supporters Trust said in a post on its X account.

"We now back all supporters trusts of Premier League clubs to come together to ensure their clubs vote in favour of removing VAR and giving us back our game."

Meanwhile, various media reports claim there will be no discussion or vote among Championship clubs about introducing VAR into the second tier next season.

Witnessing the Premier League's experience is understood to be a factor that has contributed to a collective lack of enthusiasm among Championship clubs, along with cost considerations.

The Football Supporters' Association posted details of its summer 2023 survey on Thursday morning, which included questions to the respondents around attitudes to VAR.

It found only one in 20 (5.5 per cent) of fans who had experienced VAR in stadiums rated their experience of it as good or very good.

Almost two-thirds (63.3 per cent) were against its continued use, with 91.9 per cent criticising the length of time taken to make decisions and 95 per cent saying the removal of spontaneity from goal celebrations was a chief concern.

The Premier League says it fully supports the continued use of VAR but acknowledges the need for improvements.

The league's chief football officer Tony Scholes admitted in February that the in-stadium experience of VAR was "nowhere near good enough".

The league is set to trial a protocol seen at last summer's Women's World Cup where referees communicate the final outcome of a VAR review to fans in the stadium.

Scholes said the league was also "on a journey" towards being able to broadcast live audio. Currently the laws of the game forbid it, but the league is working with the International Football Association Board (IFAB) to progress the issue.

Clubs also voted to introduce semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) in the autumn, which league sources say will speed up the average VAR check for offside by 31 seconds.

The league also points to the greater number of correct decisions since VAR's introduction. In the final season before it came in, 2018-19, the league said 82 per cent of 'key match incident' decisions were correct. That figure with VAR assistance is now 96 per cent.

Liverpool rally behind continued VAR use despite Premier League setbacks